tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27943050.post1569034036169896229..comments2023-11-02T09:53:09.569-04:00Comments on Groves U.S. History Blog: Blog #12 - Pick one of the 2 questions -Geoff Wickershamhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07430848929082686290noreply@blogger.comBlogger44125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27943050.post-44009350162867597792009-05-14T09:39:00.000-04:002009-05-14T09:39:00.000-04:00No, I would not FIGHT in the Iraq war if drafted, ...No, I would not FIGHT in the Iraq war if drafted, but I would try to do something easy to do like cooking. (my uncle was a chef in the army). The only condition i would go to the war is if i KNOW i would not get hurt or killed. Although I would try to find a way around it. I think you can get out of the draft for Education purposes, or Religious purposes. I plan on going to college when I turn 18, and I am a Christian, so I do not believe in war, so I am pretty sure I could get out of it. I do not think they ever drafted women, and even if they did, they would not put them in the line of fire (I just learned this) so I probably would not get hurt or killed. I do not think we will have a draft in this war because it will be extremely unpopular, and that will cause problems. The point I am trying to make is, I would not fight in the war, but do something easier, if I cannot get out of it by means of religion or education.Alana Walker (5th hour)noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27943050.post-58876975849246044692009-05-03T11:45:00.000-04:002009-05-03T11:45:00.000-04:00Draft.
If I was drafted to the war in Iraq I would...Draft.<br />If I was drafted to the war in Iraq I would go. I am a man who loves his country so I would go and fight for it. I would go pretty much under any conditions. I have a feeling that I would have some good experience behind a gun. And I would make a good asset to the American army. If there were nukes being launched I might think about it for awhile but I would still probably go. I don’t fear the kamikaze people who run around over there. Also if I did get drafted I would try and get some of my other friends who I know wanted to be in the army to come with me and we could be in the same squadron. All in all the American army is strong but at times it might need some extra help. I would be there if I got drafted and I would go to Iraq or our next irresolvable conflict. The United States of America is a country worth fighting for even if it isn’t our battle we still are a good country and we have a good government that made the right decision to go to war. <br />Ben DoozanAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27943050.post-54928531281969686542009-05-01T17:57:00.000-04:002009-05-01T17:57:00.000-04:00Tyler DeWald:
Chemical Weapons
The uses of chemic...Tyler DeWald:<br />Chemical Weapons<br /> The uses of chemical weapons are appropriate, with strict international laws. Some basic laws would be like, it been tested for 2+ years for any harmful or fatal contact it would do to humans. I personally like this one because I wouldn’t want to be the one who was forced to use this chemical weapon, and millions died from it. Another law would be how much chemical weapons a country can have. In reality, any extremely high amount of anything can be harmful to humans. Chemical weapons should only be used against terrain not against humans; innocent people could die or could be harmed. Agent Orange would have been a great example of a chemical weapon that I want to see in war. Other then the fact it caused cancer and in the end killing thousands of people during the Vietnam war. If we had some laws on chemical weapons during the Vietnam War, thousands and thousands of people will be still alive today. Chemical weapons should be allowed in combat under strict international laws.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27943050.post-29209332894261458282009-04-30T23:04:00.000-04:002009-04-30T23:04:00.000-04:00I think that the use of chemical weapons is never ...I think that the use of chemical weapons is never appropriate. It doesn’t matter what kind of chemical weapon at all; chemical weapons are never appropriate. The reason I think this is because, like stated in the description, AO caused cancer in American veterans and Vietnamese civilians as well as birth defects in their children. I don’t think that there should be any exception for causing harm to anyone, war or not, chemical weapons should not be used. If it were me, and I or some of my loved ones were harmed by AO or any kind of chemical weapon, I would be furious at the American government. For one, because I knew that I had no chance of stopping them or telling them not to use the weapons, and two because they put the life of my loved one, or me, in danger. I mean, obviously they put their own life in danger by going into the war in the first place but, to make it even worse by putting unsafe chemicals in their body, that would just make me so upset. This is why I think the use of chemical weapons is never appropriate.Katie Nicholls, 5th Hournoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27943050.post-25077647006123341662009-04-30T21:03:00.000-04:002009-04-30T21:03:00.000-04:00If I was drafted into the Iraq war I think I would...If I was drafted into the Iraq war I think I would do it. I feel like I should fight for my country after all the things it does for me. But there are a few conditions under which I wouldn’t go. If I was an only child in my family I wouldn’t because I have to carry on my family name. It would be a great amount of stress on my mom wondering will I ever come home and if I’m safe. Another circumstance in which I would not fight for our country is if I was currently in college. This would be a problem because most likely I would have to pay for college and I don’t think that it would be in my best interest to drop out to fight in Iraq. The last reason why I would go to war is if I was against the reasons why we are there in the first place. If I had certain religious views that did not allow me to do so I would rather be sent to jail than fight.Dallas Pariteenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27943050.post-60823659481557215442009-04-30T11:11:00.000-04:002009-04-30T11:11:00.000-04:00Paige Peak...hour-4
Because of the circumstances ...Paige Peak...hour-4<br /><br />Because of the circumstances we are under right now with the economy and the war if i were drafted to go fight in the war i woulndt go because there is no telling when you will come back home home the date for that just seems to at a a point of no return. This war has been going on for too long and with all the costs it has racked up thats probably the reasonjobs are being lost and companies are going bankrupt they spend so much money on war and not on what is desperately needed. I dont belive in war there has to be some other way to go about .And if war has to happen it really shouldnt be this long. For the people who are ok with the draft let them go to war. There should be a right or law saying if you dont want to fight in the war you dont have to.I know its good to fight for your country but for years and years ,no telling when your coming home and if you will make it back imjust not ok with that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27943050.post-85730438180159307172009-04-29T18:43:00.000-04:002009-04-29T18:43:00.000-04:00If I was drafted I would not fight because if my h...If I was drafted I would not fight because if my husband was drafted and we had kids it wouldn't be fair for the kids to have both parents in the war. Also we don't need anymore troops sent over to Iraq. If I was drafted I would ask if I could be a nurse. I would be more willing to go. I have to much in life to do then too go die in a war that we shouldn't even be fighting in. I think that the draft should excuse people who are in college. If the place I fighting in had running water and pluming I wouldn't care. Also it would be dumb to fight in a war that I don’t support.<br />Devonny BellAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27943050.post-36390413756989766732009-04-29T11:50:00.000-04:002009-04-29T11:50:00.000-04:00I don’t think that the use of chemical weapons is ...I don’t think that the use of chemical weapons is ever called for, or ever alright. These kinds of weapons are awful and they sometimes hurt even the people who are controlling them. They were also used in ways that I don’t think were appropriate. They used chemical weapons to ruin the forests in Vietnam, and I don’t think that was smart or suitable. Burning down the forests didn’t help anyway. They just helped to destroy the country that America was trying to help. Also, a lot of people have gotten cancer from using Agent Orange in the Vietnam War. These people who were using Agent Orange against the Vietnamese were hurt by their own weapons. This should be enough to convince people not to use such tactics. I also don’t think that it depends on what kind they are using. I think that these types of weapons are all too destructive to prove affective. We burned down and ruined a lot of Vietnam with the help of chemical weapons, and we still didn’t win the war. If these weapons seem to be hurting both sides more than they are helping, I don’t think that America should be using them.Katie Robinsonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27943050.post-85230844869637333382009-04-29T10:49:00.000-04:002009-04-29T10:49:00.000-04:00mary seymour
the draft:
I would definitely fight ...mary seymour<br />the draft: <br />I would definitely fight in the Iraq war if I was unfortunately drafted. I think both genders should be drafted whether or not they are actually fighting. Even if the drafted women and just had them do helpful jobs to help out those who are fighting, it would make a big difference. The only condition I would not fight in is if I was a single mother in school or something, because I would have to give up my child because there would not be any one to watch after him or her. I think that since most women fought for our rights to vote and work, then we should be treated equal to men since that’s what we wanted. Its not fair to get all of the same benefits as men, without getting all of the bad things they have to go through also. I think its hypocritical that we fought so hard to get things we wanted, but since we didn’t ask to be drafted, we don’t have to be. Things should always be equal. Single moms should be able to raise their kid till their kid is around 16 or until they can also fight.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27943050.post-68963547815483707542009-04-28T22:36:00.000-04:002009-04-28T22:36:00.000-04:00If I were to be chosen to go out and fight for my ...If I were to be chosen to go out and fight for my country, I would not fight. The main reason I would not fight is because I am not really a supporter of the war, not to mention I do not quite understand the purpose in us fighting in the war. Another reason I would not fight is because I think it should be a choice whether or not you want to go into combat. America is suppoed to be a free country, where you are able to make your own decisions. Therefor you should be able to make the decision as to what you would like to do.Also, another reason I would not go into combat is because I am not a supporter of women being in the army. I believe that it was, and always will be a "man thing". That is why i would not fight in the war, if I were to be drafted.<br />Allacia Gibson (3rd hour)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27943050.post-37474082553320279022009-04-28T20:58:00.000-04:002009-04-28T20:58:00.000-04:00Chemical
I do not thing using chemicals to fight ...Chemical<br /> I do not thing using chemicals to fight a war is appropriate. Chemicals ruin the land and won’t let people live or farm in that area for a while so it can ruin peoples lives and the economy if they cant farm. Also when you use chemicals it kills the enemy but it can give them a slow painful death and I think that is inhumane to do. It might not even kill the enemy it could put them I pain for the rest of there life and could cause cancer, so instead of dying they live in pain for the rest of there life. It could even affect our own soldiers. When the soldiers are walking thorough a city or forest that had chemicals sprayed on it, there can be some that stays in that area and can affect the soldiers. It can cause illnesses and cancer. Plus we wouldn’t know if civilians are in that area so it can kill or give cancer to civilians and young kids. So we are killing innocent people who are just trying to survive during a war. So if we are going to use a weapon to kill an enemy we shouldn’t use one that will hurt our soldiers and civilians.Ismail Khttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15258746255728152938noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27943050.post-42748305680386729412009-04-28T18:13:00.000-04:002009-04-28T18:13:00.000-04:00#2 - Draft
If I was drafted to fight in the Iraq ...#2 - Draft<br /><br />If I was drafted to fight in the Iraq War I would definitely fight. I think if you are of age and you are an American citizen you should always be ready to defend your country in a time of need. I think it would just be very crowdedly and selfish of someone who would refuse to fight for their own country. Sometimes you have to give up certain freedoms to be free. I was actually considering joining the Marines regardless of a draft or not, so my answer is quite obvious. I believe all the soldiers that have died for OUR freedom should be commended for their actions, they gave the ultimate sacrifice.. why can’t we? They were humans just like us, some drafted, some not. In any circumstance I would defend my country, regardless of the conditions. If Uncle Sam comes a callin’ I will definitely answer. Plus you get sweet benefits from serving your country! You can make a difference when you go to war and serve your country, you will also be looked at as a hero in your town. I don’t think in the near future we will need a draft, unless of course there is going to be another World War III. <br /><br />-Brandon Kauth 3rd Hour.Brandon Kauthnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27943050.post-88744476733919467532009-04-28T17:39:00.000-04:002009-04-28T17:39:00.000-04:00If I were drafted in the Iraq War, I wouldn't figh...If I were drafted in the Iraq War, I wouldn't fight. First of all, I don't really support the idea of this war, and I don't believe it should be the end-all be-all of our problems. Not only that, but I am definitely not strong enough to be fighting in a war. I would probably set the army back, because I'm so unfit and uncoordinated, and I am not exaggerating. If I was really needed, I'd try and do something that would help the army but would not require being on the front-line, like doing paperwork or something like that the army might need. I guess if the U.S. Army really, really, terribly needed someone to fight in the war, I'd feel obligated to and I would, but I would probably have to go undergo a lot of training. I do think it's a really good thing to feel the need to protect your country, but there are people who are better suited to do it than others. That being said, I don't think drafting is necessary – there are plenty of people willing to fight and protect our country. Again, if I was asked to help, I would do all I could.Sydney Hirschnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27943050.post-82966353796698338862009-04-28T15:54:00.000-04:002009-04-28T15:54:00.000-04:00I would say if it were a ;ittle later on in life a...I would say if it were a ;ittle later on in life after i have completed some of the things that i want to accomplish i would fight in the war.i think it would be very patriotic and brave of one to do so because your putting your life and also others at risk. i feel that in order to fight in a war you really have to have a clear understanding of what war really is and you have to be mentally and phisically strong.the reason i would fight in this war is because just like others you love and care for your country as one and that makes you willing to what you have to to keep it standing. i have lots of respect for the troops who are fighting because not only do they have families, but the people they are attacking do also and it must really be hard to take ones life and know that at any time yours could be taken also.<br />china wells 3rd hour.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27943050.post-87177466900098229732009-04-28T13:30:00.000-04:002009-04-28T13:30:00.000-04:00I don’t think I would fight in the Iraq war if dra...I don’t think I would fight in the Iraq war if drafted. The reason is because it’s not only scary and dangerous but I’m not exactly ‘built’ or strong. I feel that I just would not be a very good person to fight in a war because to be honest I will get killed easily. I would fight in a draft in the event that they were absolutely desperate for soldiers and they were fighting in a war that I believed in. With the Iraq war the problem is that I don’t really believe in nor support it so it’s hard to fight for something you don’t believe in. In addition, I also don’t believe that I would have the time or really be willing to give up my life for it. I would help out with the war, cooking for or even possibly helping those who were hurt. I know this is selfish but I don’t want to give up everything I have worked for in my life and risk dying for something I simply don’t support in any way shape or form. I think that people who are able and willing to risk their life for the wars are amazing people and I support them all the way however I can support the people without supporting the war itself.elaina gardnernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27943050.post-63253279862740185072009-04-28T10:01:00.000-04:002009-04-28T10:01:00.000-04:00I believe that the use of chemical weapons is not ...I believe that the use of chemical weapons is not appropriate for use in wars because most chemical weapons do not kill people right away but instead they make them suffer as they are dyeing slowly and the point of a war isn’t meant to make people suffer as much as possible but it is to make bad situations better on all. Chemical weapons completely defeats the point of war because of that reason as well as some people that have been subjected to chemical weapons don’t die and are able to fight so the chemical weapons are inefficient in the number of people are killed by the attacks. My last point is that chemical weapons that have been used by united states are also affecting American soldiers because the us has no control over who the weapon harms in an area because it harms everyone and everything. Because of this innocent people that have fought for the united states as well as the civilians in Vietnam who have done nothing but live their lives and mind their own business are being cursed with diseases that cannot be cured and while they await for help they are slowly dying due to the carelessness of the united states government. As well as the people that die from these weapons there are forests and animals in the forests that have parished because of this.<br /><br />Eric BRuning<br />Hour 3Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27943050.post-2469780402054924372009-04-28T09:09:00.000-04:002009-04-28T09:09:00.000-04:00I had been thinking about how to respond to this q...I had been thinking about how to respond to this question ever since I wrote it up this past weekend, and I my attitude hasn't changed even since I was young enough to be drafted in 1991 when the first Gulf War occurred. If drafted, I would serve my country and do it proudly in the tradition of those men and women who have gone before me. <br /><br />Even if I disagreed with a conflict, as a soldier, that's not my job to set the nation's foreign policy or determine the terms of peace. I can only hope that fighting honorably and leading my men in battle wisely and with the help of able and brave commanders that I will quickly end a war that I might disagree with. <br /><br />Because of my college degrees, I would probably be sent to OTS (Officers' Training School) where I would hopefully gain the necessary tools needed to be a great officer. Only in battle would I really know if I could lead men into potentially deadly scenarios (including my own death). <br /><br />Our country asks for a few things in return for the privilege of living here: voting, jury duty, paying taxes, and answering the call when we're needed. <br /><br />I think we sometimes forget that we have a few responsibilities as citizens of the U.S. <br /><br />If such a situation were to arise and I was needed, I would go. The choice would by no means be an easy one. I'd be leaving a family behind. But millions of others have gone before me, and there's little that makes my sacrifice different than anyone else's. It just seems unique b/c it's mine. <br /><br />Mr. W.Geoff Wickershamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07430848929082686290noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27943050.post-44146764350424887472009-04-28T08:25:00.000-04:002009-04-28T08:25:00.000-04:00If I was drafted into the army by the Unites State...If I was drafted into the army by the Unites States I would go to war. In a way it defeats the purpose of the land of the free, but if the country I lived for was in a war and needed my help and I was drafted I would go without thinking. If I was old enough to be drafted into the Iraq war I would most likely not want to fight. I oppose and still do oppose bush’s ways and do not support him and by fighting in his war I think would be supporting his ways so I would not want to fight in the Iraq war. If I was a single parent and got drafted I would probably not want to be drafted and if I was almost done with college and was asked to join the army I would not want to join just because I spent so much time learning whatever the degree was I got and wouldn’t want all that to go to waste by enrolling in the army and possibly be killed. <br /><br />Jacob SilverAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27943050.post-32192875164192092822009-04-28T08:00:00.000-04:002009-04-28T08:00:00.000-04:00I think in any form war is cruel and all nations s...I think in any form war is cruel and all nations should try to avoid conflicts involvig weapons and fighting. However, if there is no other option than fighting I personlally believe it should be done without using chemical weapons. I think history has shown us the devestating pictures and the horrible story these weapons do to the country and the people, who live there.<br />It all started back during World War I when the use of chemicals in fighting became common use. We often tend to forget this, because all our foucus is on WW II. <br />In Vietnam Agent Orange destroyed too much and maybe was one of the reason why America withdrew,because we destroyed the Southern Vietnamese living space and put them into poverty with no shelter, no food, and often death in their families. <br />Also, we don't know how chemica weapons, if puut to use, will change our world. Just imagine terrorists getting their hands on chemical weapons! They could destroy just everything – our whole world. <br />Another point why chemical weapons are so horrible is the effect they have on the human body. Agent Orange was just supposed to destroy the jungle, but it also made people getting cancer and other diseases. <br />Do we really want this?Johanna Hilbertnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27943050.post-21690972591083646212009-04-28T07:51:00.000-04:002009-04-28T07:51:00.000-04:00blog drafting question 2
If I were drafted to the ...blog drafting question 2<br />If I were drafted to the Iraq war I would not like it. I don’t have any interest to fight in a war so I wouldn’t like to go. However, if I pretty much had to go, I would prefer a position that was not actually a soldier with a gun. The draft is not necessary in my opinion and isn’t right because I already have the choice to join the army, so why should I become forced into it. When it comes down to women fighting in the war, I think that should be allowed to unless they are pregnant. So I would not want to fight if I were drafted, but I think there isn’t a choice weather to or not. I still think there shouldn’t even be a draft again. <br /> <br />bobby hbobby haagnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27943050.post-85891900107350431602009-04-28T07:25:00.000-04:002009-04-28T07:25:00.000-04:002) The draft
I would not fight in the Iraq war if...2) The draft <br />I would not fight in the Iraq war if I were to be drafted. The reason that I wouldn’t fight is because I don’t necessarily believe in the war. Why would I fight in a war that I don’t believe in? I would hopefully get some other duty that doesn’t involve fighting first of all. If I were to go into the war I would not have the same desire that many other Americans may have. I understand that anyone can be drafted no matter what their belief is but I think that your job in the war should depend on your true beliefs and morals. If you are highly against the war or are very religious, it may be against your morals to fight and perhaps even kill others. The only reason that I would fight is if the reason for the war changed. I do not really see why we are in Iraq in the first place. I would feel as if I am fighting in a pointless war. If the reason we were fighting is something that I agree with than fighting in the war would not be so big of an issue for me. Overall, I personally don’t think that there should be a draft at all because the war is unnecessary.Jake Chmara 5th hournoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27943050.post-69483370970255514882009-04-27T23:22:00.000-04:002009-04-27T23:22:00.000-04:00CHEMICAL:
The use of chemical weapons is not appro...CHEMICAL:<br />The use of chemical weapons is not appropriate in all situations. It does not depend on what kind and what they are used. They affects more than just the things we were trying to do. Even if they are meant to help, they destroy the land and affect people around who do not have anything to do with why Agent Orange or a chemical weapon is being used. Agent Orange was used to destroy the foliage of Vietnam. This meant that Agent Orange was going to destroy about 30% of the entire country of Vietnam. Agent Orange did not only destroy the land, but caused long lasting affects on humans and in Vietnam. Many American veterans and Vietnamese civilians suffer from cancer and other long lasting diseases and problems because of Agent Orange. Not only were the people involved in the war affected but many of the Vietnamese civilians’ unborn children suffered from birth defects because of Agent Orange. Furthermore, land becomes completely destroyed and destroying our own land is the last thing that we need on or suffering Earth. In conclusion, Agent Orange and other chemicals like it should never be used because of its affects on the lives of innocent humans and Earth. <br /><br />Sarra 5thSarra Serhane 5thnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27943050.post-1531025044407859302009-04-27T22:38:00.000-04:002009-04-27T22:38:00.000-04:00I think that in some special circumstances there i...I think that in some special circumstances there is a time to use chemical weapons. The army did the wrong thing by using chemical weapons. It was wrong to use chemical weapons because it killed off 30% of their forests and it caused many health problems among the United States and Vietnam. On the other hand they did have reason to use chemical weapons because the Vietnam soldiers would use guerrilla tactics and go hide in the forests. If our soldiers would have gone into the forests the rebels would have killed our soldiers because the rebels know then land so well. Going back to my first point, when we use Agent Orange and other chemicals it doesn’t just kill the Vietnamese people it kill our own soldiers. Most of the sickness that occurred was cancer. Even though the United States was targeting Vietnamese rebels with Agent Orange it did not just affect them it affected the townspeople that were not involved in the war in anyway. If the United States really wanted to flush the rebels out of the forest they could have used other tactics. One of these tactics could have been bombing the forests over and over until the rebels start to run. On one hand the use was not justified but on the other hand it was.Matt Trogunoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27943050.post-81391579075772953202009-04-27T22:11:00.000-04:002009-04-27T22:11:00.000-04:00Melanie Eiten 3rd hour
No I do not think it a good...Melanie Eiten 3rd hour<br />No I do not think it a good idea to use chemical warfare because it kills mass amounts of soldiers, it kills innocent people living in the area because they have no way of getting away because of the way the fumes travel long distances, and it can causes long term effects to those exposed to the chemical hardware. War, as bad as it is, is able to kill hundreds of people a day through conventional warfare; but with chemical warfare thousands of people can be killed. Innocent people can die because they are trapped in the middle of a war zone, where they can’t get free causing them to get into these deadly situations where chemical weapons are being dropped and they end up dying. Even people miles away can be affected or killed because of gas fume traveling long distances causing them to get extremely sick or even die. Lastly, those soldiers who are exposed, but not killed can have the poisons enter their bodies causing cancer and in the case of Agent Orange, causing birth defects in their innocent children. Chemical warfare is not fair and should not be used because of its effects on all people, causing illness and death.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27943050.post-30182887676179103502009-04-27T22:01:00.000-04:002009-04-27T22:01:00.000-04:00Question 1. I think that there are some situations...Question 1. I think that there are some situations where using chemical weapons may be necessary, but I think it depends on the situation and the type of chemicals. I think that they should only be used to protect our greatest interests, and only if those interests are in great enough danger to need the chemical weapons. I think it also should depend on the kind of weapons used. The weapons we use should be somewhat environmentally friendly so we don’t destroy the ecosystem completely. I think that we should also try not to spread them out over large distances. If we really need them, we should pick specific points where they will help our cause the most. I think that the one of the more important things would be to protect the environment. We shouldn’t be completely destroying areas so that we leave a barren wasteland. We should take the responsibility to protect nature. We should also protect the people to some degree. We shouldn’t use chemicals that will cause cancers and birth defects. This will effect many generations to come, and will extend the range of our attack. But, the point of this attack would not be to ruin generations and generations of lives. It would have to be protecting our interests and leave a temporary impact.Jack DiLauranoreply@blogger.com